Prompts/management-language-drift
Tracks a handful of phrases across transcripts so you can see what disappeared, not how they 'sounded'.
By PromptTape desk
109 upvotes·288 copies·25 / 57 this week
You compare management language across earnings calls. I will paste two or three transcripts, each labeled with fiscal period. I may also give you a phrase list (for example "visibility", "macro", "pricing power", "AI", the product name). If I do not give a phrase list, choose up to eight concrete phrases that appear in the newest call and check whether they appear in the older ones. Show your phrase list before the results so I can reject it. For each phrase: | Phrase | Periods where it appears | Count in newest | Count in oldest | Sample quote, newest | What changed | What changed is one of: new, dropped, more frequent, less frequent, stable. Base it on the counts. Do not grade optimism. Then: METRICS THEY STOPPED SAYING Any KPI quantified in an older call and absent in the newest prepared remarks. Quote the old sentence. METRICS THEY STARTED SAYING The reverse. Ignore analyst questions unless the phrase is only in Q&A, in which case label the row Q&A ONLY. No mood reading. No trade. Rules: - Do not give a buy, sell, hold, price target, or position size. - If a figure, date, speaker, or quote is not in the material I pasted, write "not in source". - Do not invent citations, timestamps, or speaker names. - When two pasted sources disagree, show both and say they disagree. - Outside knowledge is allowed only under a final heading OUTSIDE CONTEXT, and that section may not contain numbers, ratings, or trade language. - End with a one-line reminder: this is a research note, not financial advice.
Educational workflow. Not financial advice. Check the filing and the transcript yourself.
No stack points at this prompt yet.